It‘s Only The Calories Count, Not Source!

There is undoubtedly that overweight and obesity can bring along many unwanted ailments including high cholesterol, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart disease, stroke and even certain types of cancer. People who are overweight or obese will start to adopt different kinds of diet plan to help them reduce weight.

Different diet plan will have their own specified proportion of fat, carbohydrates and protein. It seems, however, that weight loss does not really depend on the source of the calories.

Researchers from Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana reported on January 18, 2012 in the ‘American Journal of Clinical Nutrition’ that there were no differences in weight loss or the reduction of fat between 4 diets with different proportions of fat, carbohydrates and protein. It is adherence that matters. Those participants who adhered better lost more weight than those who did not.

As shown in earlier research, certain diets like those with very low carbohydrates work better than others though there has been no consensus among researchers.

Participants were assigned to 1 of the 4 diets: Average protein, low fat and higher carbohydrates; High protein, low fat and higher carbohydrates; Average protein, high fat and lower carbohydrates; High protein, high fat and lower carbohydrates. All the diets were designed to reduce 750 calories a day.

Their weight, fat mass and lean mass were checked after 6 months and again at 2 years after starting the diets. At 6 months, participants lose more than 4.1 kilos of fat and approximately 2.3 kilos of lean mass, though they regained some of these at the 2-year mark. Nevertheless, people who managed to adhere to their diet were able to keep a weight loss of more than 3.6 kilos after 2 years including a nearly 1.4 kilos loss of abdominal fat, a drop of more than 7 percent.

During the 2-year period, many of the participants dropped out and those who completed it did not have the diets exactly the same as what had been assigned.

For instance, all the 4 diet groups ended up getting about 20 percent of their calories from protein after 2 years. This was quite different from what the researchers had hoped for: 2 diet groups get 25 percent of their calories from protein and the other 2 groups get 15 percent of their calories from protein.

The findings suggested that all diet plans can work and it is adherence that can help the weight loss success. People should choose the diet that is comfortable for them.

Personalized Cancer Treatment

PERSONALIZED TREATMENT OF CANCER: THE CONTRIBUTION OF GENOMICS

Thanks to technical advances, it is now possible to study the entire genome of a tumor to select the most appropriate treatment in the management of the patient.

The research contributes to the development of a growing number of antitumor drugs particularly promising targeted therapies. These treatments are highly effective in their specificity of action: they act, in effect, on cells that have precise molecular characteristics associated with their malignant nature. Therefore, these new drugs are only effective in patients whose tumor carries specific abnormalities. Their administration thus requires genetic characterization of tumor cells to destroy.

A strategy to obtain maximum information on tumors is genomic sequencing. This strategy is to decipher the entire genetic makeup of tumor cells in order to catalog all the flaws that entail. By comparing the resulting catalog to the arsenal of available targeted therapies, doctors can more easily choose the most appropriate treatment in the management of patients.

This approach has remained utopian sequence an entire genome was indeed a work far too long and as well costly for it to be done in order to choose an anti-tumor therapy. However, today the situation is different: an American team has indeed demonstrated that it is possible to analyze the genetic makeup of a tumor in three to four weeks, for approximately $ 3,809. This period is consistent with the initiation of treatment, and the cost is not significantly higher than other methods currently used to characterize tumors.

It remains a problem to solve: in their pilot study of four patients, U.S. researchers have identified genetic defects that can be targeted by drugs currently being evaluated. However, patients have benefited from these treatments: testing clinics being focused on the use of these drugs in cancers other than those they developed.

Thus, the use of sequencing to facilitate personalized treatment can be considered without a change in the implementation of clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of new targeted therapies.

Stomach Cancer Causes

Even though the precise cause of Crohn's disease is tranquil unidentified, an arrangement of ecological factors and genetic predisposition seem to be the cause of disease. Genetic risk factors have been fully elucidated, making it the first Crohn's disease, genetic diseases, complex, whose origin was understood. The relative risk of contracting disease, which is a mutation of one gene, the risks are in fact very low (about 1:200). Generally speaking, the genetic data suggest that the immune system in patients with congenital disorder Crohn's disease and the direct evaluation of the patient's immune function confirms this. This disease is seen as innate immunity, is "Chronic inflammation caused by adaptive immunity trying to compensate for decreased function of the innate immune system.

Genetics

Some studies indicate that Crohn's disease may have a genetic cause. People who have a brother or sister withthe disease, has thirty times more possible to develop than the wide-ranging population.

Mutations inthe CARD 15 gene (as well recognized as NOD2 gene) are associated with Crohn's disease. In previous studies had only two genes were associated with Crohn's disease, but scientists believe that genes play a role in more than thirty in the disease, either directly or indirectly through intermediary variables as the cause. Abnormalities of the XBP1 gene have only just been found that the causal factors of inflammatory bowel disease.

Environmental factors


Because of its prevalence in highly industrialized areas of the world, it is believed that the diet may be one of the causes of disease. Positive correlation between the incidence of disease and amplified ingestion of milk protein, animal protein and a higher proportion of omega6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and omega3. It was rather found a negative correlation of this disease in an increase in consumption of vegetable protein and no correlation with fish protein. The smoke turned out to be an important factor in increasing the risk of recurrence is active. The introduction of hormonal contraception in the United States in 1960 is associated with a dramatic increase in the incidence of Crohn's disease. Although a causal relationship has not been demonstrated in the fact that he still regards these drugs affect the digestive system in a similar way as with smoking. Numerous scientific studies have postulated a "isotretinoin as a possible cause of Crohn's disease in some individuals.

The immune system


Abnormalities in the immune system have often been considered because of Crohn's disease. Many believe that disease is an autoimmune disease caused by an abnormal response to cytokines lymphocytes. The gene, which more recent studies of closely related ATG16L1 with Crohn's disease, which may cause "autophagy and can hinder the body's ability to attack invasive bacteria.

Unlike prevalent suggests that Crohn's disease is a disorder of autoimmune T cells, some studies suggest that results from a deterioration of the innate immune system. Immunodeficiency virus, which has been shown that it is (at least partially) to reduce the secretion of cytokines by macrophages, is believed to be due to an inflammatory reaction, especially in the large intestine where the bacteria is very high.

Stomach Cancer Causes

Stomach Cancer Causes

Chrons Disease Symptom

GI symptoms
Endoscopy image of colon showing serpiginous ulcer, easily seen in Crohn's disease. Many people with Crohn's disease symptoms years before the diagnosis. Usually the onset is between 15 and 30 years, but can occur at any age. Due to the nature of "irregular" gastrointestinal disease and depth of tissue involvement can be the initial symptoms are more unstable than typical ulcerative colitis. People with Crohn's disease flare of chronic recurrent symptoms and blame the remission period.

Abdominal pain can be the first symptom of Crohn's disease. A "often accompanied by diarrhea, especially in those who underwent surgery. Diarrhea may be more or less bloody. The nature of the diarrhea in Crohn's disease depends on the part of the small intestine and colon involved. Ileiti usually leads to large volumes of watery stool. Colitis can result in less stool volume, but with a higher frequency. Fecal consistency may range from solid to weak. In severe cases, an individual more than 20 days and bowel discharge need to wake up at night to defecate. Blood in stool is less frequent in Crohn's disease compared with ulcerative colitis, but may be discovered in connection with Crohn's colitis. Intestinal draining blood are usually transient and may be bright red or dark. In severe colitis, Crohn's disease, it may be heavy bleeding. Bloating and swelling can be added to intestinal problems.

Symptoms caused by stenosis are also common intestinal Crohn's disease. Abdominal pain is often acute in areas that narrowing of the intestine. In the context of severe stenosis, vomiting and nausea may indicate the beginning of small bowel obstruction. Although the correlation is higher in relation to ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease may also be associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis, a type of inflammation of the bile ducts.

Problems in the perianal area may be important in Crohn's disease. Itching or pain around the "anus may indicate inflammation, fistulization or abscess around. Perianal skin tags are common. Faecal incontinence may accompany diseases of perianal Crohn's disease. At the opposite end of the digestive tract may be affected by non-healing wounds mouth (aphthous ulcers). Rarely the esophagus and stomach may be involved in disease. If disabled, can cause symptoms such as difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia), upper abdominal pain and vomiting.

Systemic symptoms

Crohn's disease, as well as many other chronic inflammatory diseases, can cause a number of systemic symptoms. In children, growth failure is common. Many of them are diagnosed with the disease due to their inability to maintain proper growth. Up to 30% of children with this disease with growth retardation. Fever may be present, even more to 38.5 ˚ C is rare, if there are no complications such as abscess. Elderly, Crohn's disease manifest as weight loss is usually related to decreased food intake, because patients with symptoms of intestinal Crohn's disease often feel better when not eating. People with this disease in a large part of the small intestine may also have malabsorption of carbohydrates or fats, which can further exacerbate weight loss.

Nutritional deficiency due to reduced intake of anorexia and self-imposed determines steatorrhea, megaloblastic or microcytic anemia, hypoprotidemia, edema, bone demineralization, dehydration and hypokalemia.

Chrons Disease Extraintestinal

In addition to systemic and gastrointestinal involvement of Crohn's disease can also affect many other organs. Inflammation of the eye, known as uveitis, can cause severe pain, especially when the eye is exposed to light (photophobia). Inflammation may also involve the white of the eye (sclera), a condition called episcleritis. Both episcleritis uveitis, which can lead to blindness if left untreated.

Crohn's disease is associated with the type of rheumatologic disease known as seronegative spondyloarthropathy. It is characterized by inflammation of one or more joints (arthritis) or muscle insertions (enthesitis). Arthritis can affect larger joints such as knees or shoulders, or may include only the small joints of hands and feet. Arthritis can also involve the spine, leading to ankylosing spondylitis if the entire structure is, or simply sacroiliitis if only the lower spine is involved. Symptoms of arthritis include pain, warmth, swelling, stiffness and loss of joint mobility or function.

Crohn's disease may also affect the skin, blood and endocrine system. Type of skin exposure, "erythema nodosum, shown as red nodules which usually appear on the shins. Erythema nodosum is due to inflammation of the subcutaneous base, and is characterized by septal panniculitis. Another skin lesion, pyoderma gangrenosum, is typically characterized by painful ulcerating node. Crohn's disease also increases the risk of blood clots, swelling and pain in the legs, and can be a symptom of deep vein thrombosis, while difficulty breathing may be due to pulmonary embolism. "Hemolytic anemia is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks the red blood cells, which is common Crohn's disease and can cause fatigue, pallor, and other symptoms common in "anemia. Clubs, deformities at the ends of the fingers may be due to illness. Finally, Crohn's disease causes of osteoporosis and bone loss. People with osteoporosis are at increased risk of bone fractures .

Crohn's disease can cause complications, neurological (as reported in 15% of patients). The most common are seizures, stroke, myopathy, peripheral neuropathy, headache and depression.

Influence of disease may also suffer from granulomatous cheilitis and other forms of orofacial granulomatosis.

Chrons Disease Complication

Crohn's disease can lead to several complications in the intestines, including obstruction, development of fistulae and abscesses. Generally the block valve, or adhesions which narrow the lumen, blocking the passage of intestinal contents. Fistulae may develop between two loops bowel, between bowel and bladder, between the intestine and vagina, and between the intestine and skin. Abscesses may occur in the abdomen or in the perianal area.

Crohn's disease also increases the risk of cancer in the area of ​​inflammation. For example, people with Crohn's disease involving the small bowel are at increased risk of colon cancer. Likewise, people with Crohn's colitis have a relative risk of 5.6 for developing colon cancer. Screening for colorectal cancer with colonoscopy is designed for those with Crohn's colitis for at least eight years.

Individuals with Crohn's disease are at risk of malnutrition for many reasons, including reduced food intake and absorption. The risk increases after small bowel resection. These individuals may require oral supplements to increase their calorie intake, or in severe cases, parenteral nutrition, total (TPN). Most people with moderate to severe Crohn's disease turn to for help dietitian in nutrition.

Crohn's disease can be problematic during pregnancy and some medications can cause side effects on the fetus or mother. Consultation with the obstetrician and gastroenterologist about Crohn's disease and all medicines, it can be assumed, it may take preventive measures. In some cases, during pregnancy may lead to remission of the disease. Some drugs can affect sperm count, or information, may adversely affect fertility in men.

Other complications of the disease may be "infected Iris and" anorexia.

Chrons Disease Symptom

Chrons Disease Symptom

Crohn s Disease Cancer

Crohn's disease or Crohn's disease or IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) or also known as regional enteritis, is a disease chronic inflammatory bowel that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract , from mouth to  anus , causing a wide range of symptoms. It mainly causes abdominal pain , diarrhea (which may also be bloody if the inflammation is important), vomiting or weight loss , but it can moreover cause complication external the gastrointestinal tract just like skin rashes , rheumatoid arthritis , eye inflammation, fatigue and poor concentration.

Crohn's disease is believed to be an autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the gastrointestinal tract causing inflammation, but is classified as a type of inflammatory bowel disease. There is evidence of a susceptibility gene for the disease and this leads us to consider individuals with sick brothers among individuals at high risk. Males and females are equally affected. Cigarette smokers have two times more likely to develop Crohn's disease than non-smokers. Crohn's disease affects between 400,000 and 600,000 people in North America. The prevalence estimated for Northern Europe ranges from 27 to 48 per 100,000 inhabitants. Crohn's disease tends to at hand at the outset in the teens and twenties, with another peak incidence between fifty and seventy years, even though the disease can come about at in the least age.

There is no cure pharmaceutical or surgical known for Crohn's disease. The treatment options are limited to symptom control, maintenance of remission and relapse prevention.

The disease is named subsequent to American gastroenterologist BurrillBernard Crohn , which, in 1932 , along with 2 colleagues, described a sequence of patients with inflammation of ileus terminal, the area most affected by the disease. For this reason, the disease has also been called regional ileitis or regional enteritis.

Crohn s Disease Cancer

Crohn s Disease Cancer

Is Video Game Really Bad For Children?

Video game, together with other screen-based entertainments like TV and DVD watching, as well as leisure time computer use, has long been accused as one of the culprits that cause children obesity.

Does this mean that children should be totally banned from playing video games? Researchers from Baylor College of Medicine might have a different perspective, as they believed video games could be used to encourage kids to eat healthier foods.

Their study, which was conducted in the United States, found that children who played certain video games increased the amount of fruit and vegetables they ate each day by around one serving. In the United States, nearly one in five 6- to 19-year-olds is obese. The findings were published on December 7, 2010 in the ‘American Journal of Preventive Medicine’.

The 2 video games used in the study were "Escape from Diab” and “Nanoswarm" designed by Archimage to change diet and physical activity behaviors to reduce the risk of becoming obese and diabetic. Archimage is a Houston-based visual arts studio using its experience in computer-based architecture to specialize in serious video game development for the medial research community.

“Escape from Diab” and “Nanoswarm” were designed as epic video game adventures that are comparable to commercial quality video games. A broad diversity of behavior change procedures was incorporated into the games, which can really motivate players to substantially improve diet behaviors.

Obese children are more likely to grow up to be obese adults, to suffer from many chronic diseases including diabetes, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), stroke and fatty liver disease, and to die prematurely of any cause, as shown by numerous studies.

The finding is definitely a useful step towards fighting childhood obesity because increasing intake of fruit and vegetables could reduce the risk of obesity.

But, researchers also pointed out that while there was increased intake of health foods, children still failed to consume the minimum daily amount of fruit and vegetables recommended by doctors. What worrying them most is that children did not get enough physical exercise. According to health professionals, children should eat 5 servings a day of fruit or vegetables and get an hour of moderate to vigorous exercise.

Though serious video games hold promise, the researchers still felt that their effectiveness and mechanisms of change among youth need to be more thoroughly investigated.

How To Help Women Quit Smoking?

Smoking is definitely not a good habit for health. Smokers are at a higher risk of getting not only lung cancer but also other diseases including heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). More importantly, smokers can pose health risk to people around them through secondhand smoke.

While smokers are aware of the risk they face, many of them especially females are reluctant to quit because they afraid they could gain weight after they stop smoking. In fact, most smokers who quit smoking will eventually gain 5 to 15 pounds.

Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center reported that a combination of specialized counseling and the anti-smoking drug Zyban might boost, at least for a while, chances of quitting smoking for female smokers.

Zyban is a prescription drug used to help smokers give up their habit. It comes in a pill form, and it does not contain nicotine. Hence, it is not a nicotine replacement therapy product. Zyban is the trade name of the drug called “bupropion” and it was approved in 1997 as a stop smoking aid.

The findings, appeared on March 22, 2010 in the ‘Archives of Internal Medicine’, showed that over a period of 6 months of treatment, women who received the combo therapy were more successful at quitting than those who received weight counseling only, and more successful than those who received standard smoking-cessation counseling plus Zyban.

Over the period of 6 months, 34 percent of women in the group that received weight counseling and Zyban consistently abstained, comparing to 21 percent of women who received standard counseling and Zyban, 11 percent of those who received weight counseling and placebo (inactive pills) and 10 percent of those who had standard counseling and placebo.

However, the positive effect faded after treatment ended. At the 1-year mark, 24 percent of women in the group that received weight counseling and Zyban had still remained abstinent, as compared with those in the group that received standard therapy/Zyban. Yet, researchers still insisted that cognitive behavioral therapy, which was developed by them, aimed at smokers' weight-gain issues could give certain women an extra push to quit.

If You Quit Smoking, Others Will Just Follow!

Smoking is not a desirable habit since it will not only put smokers but also place non-smokers through second smoke at higher risk of getting many diseases including cancer, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), and stroke. That is why many countries around the world including China have banned smoking in the public areas.

The influence among the social network could, however, also help smokers give up smoking immediately.

According to a paper published in the May 22, 2008 edition of the ‘New England Journal of Medicine’, if a person quit smoking, then this person’s spouse, best friends, colleagues and even the surrounding people who are not known very well to this person will just follow suit.

Researchers from Harvard Medical School analyzed relationships among some 12,000 people over 3 decades and found that a steady decrease in smoking over that period occurred in clusters. So if there is a change in the zeitgeist of this social network, the whole group of people who are connected but who might not know each other all quit together.

Zeitgeist means the spirit of the times or the spirit of the age. It is the general cultural, intellectual, ethical, spiritual within a specific group, along with the general ambiance, morals, socio-cultural direction, and mood associated with an era.

Researchers reconstructed the social networks of 12,067 individuals during a period between 1971 and 2003, recording major life changes such as marriage, death and divorce.

All the study participants also listed contact information for close friends, work colleagues and neighbors. Interestingly, many of those friends and colleagues had also joined the study. This enabled the researchers to observe a total of 53,228 families, social or professional relationships. Their findings showed that people quit smoking in clusters.

Over the 30-year period, the average size of each particular cluster of smokers within the entire network remains about the same but there are fewer and fewer of these clusters left as time goes on.

How to Overcome Obesity and Cancer

In 2001, experts concluded that colon cancer, breast (postmenopausal), endometrium, kidney, and esophagus, associated with obesity. Obesity and low physical activity causes approximately 25 to 30% of major cancers such as colon cancer, breast (postmenopausal), endometrium, kidney and esophagus cancer.

Research conducted in the United States in patients over 16 years and non-Smokers, clearly shows that both men and women are more obese at baseline (with the examination-IMT), have a higher risk of suffering from cancer. In this study, an increased risk of cancers such as kidney and uterine cancer in women and liver cancer in men is surprising. Results from another study claimed that obesity is the cause of the 2nd cancer after smoking in the United States.

In the world, the increasing incidence of obesity and smoking is reduced, so that it is estimated that obesity 1 next decade will be the first risk factor for cancer in the United States. The results of this study were presented by the American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund International, with the theme: Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Now the estimated two thirds of the population in America is overweight.

Worldwide, the incidence of cancer is increasing faster than population growth. Although it has been known that obesity increases the incidence of cancer, but the quantity and cancer risks where the risk is increased still need further evaluation. The American Institute for Cancer Research and the World Cancer Research Fund International has gathered its members to evaluate the risk of cancer.

The data discussed is the data from 7000 study have been published. This all relates to food that you input into your stomach. daripda that naturopathy and natural organic food is believed to overcome them, because it heals the body from foods rather than drugs! visit info here

Fasting slows tumor

Malignant tumors, often referred to as cancer are the second most common natural cause of death in Germany and despite intensive research there is still no effective cure promises healing. It is also well known that fat-and calorie-rich diet promotes the development of malignant tumors.

Now, however, researchers from Texas, USA achieved much success talking with fasting. In laboratory mice treated with drugs were treated cancer Trigger before, the researchers have several fasts and diets tested quickly and has been found that those mice that calorie food have
received far more cancer developed less often, because those mice, the normal or particularly fat and have received high caloric food.

The test series was indeed carried out with skin cancer, but also for most other cancers validity. A low-calorie food, and diets and fasting prevent cancer before and thus assist the body in addition to successfully combat the tumor.

The results of the research will hopefully help in the future to defeat cancer successful and better than before, and to provide for those affected or at risk of appropriate nutrition plans.

Cancer cells love sugar

Cancer researcher Dr. Johannes F. Coy summarizes his work in ways that can be selectively reduced by an appropriate diet the dangers of cancer.

The primary result is so frightening as banal as: Cancer cells love sugar.

This did "we" of course before, but Dr. Coy was probably a gene within the cancer cells, which acts as a motor in it and in the first place due to the activation of these, generating energy from sugar.

The consequences of each should be known. Metastasis by resistance occurs even against traditional methods of fighting cancer, such as radiation treatment.

Thus, foods that affect these cancer-development positive, even everyday products such as bread, pasta, rice and potatoes. The only way to counter this is a consistent anti-cancer diet.

The basic intention, which is sought by that is, a reduction in blood glucose and therefore insulin secretion. Thus, the natural fat-burning of the entire body is strengthened, which in turn protect against this cancer. In this context, given Dr. Coy put two important advice to their attention, according to his knowledge, the basic building block towards the fight against cancer.

So shall first be dispensed with any kind of finished products. Such products have been robbed in the manufacturing process of their common elements which are missing from the body and then a negative development is promoted.

Furthermore, one is acidification of the body to absolutely avoid. This can best be made ​​through the consumption of food on which the effect of acidification have on the body.

Examples of such products are butter milk and foods containing citrate. Only then can one's body effectively in the fight against cancer through nutrition support.

Vegetables against cancer

We knew it all along: A healthy and balanced diet can make a valuable contribution to personal well-being and the prevention of disease.

And the same goes for cancer in general - not only for colon cancer .
The proposed cancer researcher Dr. John Croy nutritional approach promises not only ill, the risk of cancer to reduce significantly, but also stop the growth of tumors. His findings are based on the proven from him "TKTL-1 gene that is responsible, according to Dr. Croy, for the spread of cancer cells. Sugar is the main nutrient of the gene lacks this, can also prevent the cancer spread to his, said the doctor.

Incidentally, may I (again) to say that I sugar (meaning the sugar) consider one of the most harmful products.

Incidentally, Dr. Croy's weapons against cancer are called fruits and vegetables. It contains vitamins, trace elements, minerals and phytochemicals inhibit the growth of cancer cells.
Attaches particular importance to the cancer doctor present at the fabrics resveratrol, quercetin and Salvestrols, which can be detected mainly in fresh fruits and vegetables.

Dr. Croy is generally recommended to the consumer, to original, non-cultivated fruits and vegetables to use. In preparation should be limited to frying, steaming or baking. The boiling in too much water destroyed the major mediators.

According to the cancer researcher should cabbage on the menu are missing and not be eaten up to four times a week. Thus, the risk is of getting breast or bladder cancers to decrease significantly. It is a careful preparation, if possible, a steamer must be found. Also eaten raw cabbage is a real mineral spring.

Tomato recommends that the physician fully. In addition to antioxidants include tomatoes rich in vitamin E and beta carotene. A special feature leads to Dr. Croy that contained Lyopin can develop its full effect only when heated. He therefore recommends that preferably pureed tomato soup or concentrated tomato paste in the menu.

For centuries the health benefits of onions and garlic is known. Special importance in the fight against cancer is to the sulfur compound allicin. The fabric can be formed only when the tubers and small cuts can rest a while. Optimally, a combination with oil. Tolerates heat, the valuable material is not.

Citrus fruits, the doctor recommends for the general strengthening of the immune system. Furthermore, they can increase the effectiveness of plant compounds by one adds the freshly squeezed juice salads or desserts. Also fresh berries are considered cancer inhibitor. Blackberries, raspberries, blueberries, strawberries and black currants can also be used frozen.

When seasoning the food recommends Dr. Croy the plant material of turmeric prevents the formation of metastatic cancer cells, bringing the death. He remains in the body longer when seasoned with additional pepper.

Well, many things in this post you have probably already read somewhere. The only question is: do the same?

If you already know do not now what you really want to implement now read but simply my " diet formula "- which consists of only four words ... please click here .

And a note to the fasting should not be missed, of course: Fasting, in my experience offers a good opportunity for a break to allow the digestive system. At the same time, your body "from the inside out" ... feed the associated " cleansing effect "I've been sufficiently described:

Fast against cancer

Fasting for cancer? In view of these considerations suggest the vast majority of doctors hands together above his head:

"Nonsense!"
"Dangerous!"
"Let this be just!"
Either way similar statements I have heard and read more often.

How do you justify for this knowledge?

Experience of fast doctors and practitioners, such as by Rudolf Breuss (known by the Breuss treatment ) show that fasting helps in cancer.

I am grateful for any research that deals with this issue. Because it shows up: Fasting has positive effects .

For example, studies with mice showed: A fasting during chemotherapy can favorably affect the course of recovery. If a fasting accompanies chemotherapy, chemotherapy is better tolerated. The chances of recovery increase.

Until now, most doctors were assuming that the side effects of chemotherapy can not be prevented, because "to represent a complex system" means the healthy body cells.

Fasting would be an easy way to make healthy cells more resistant - this took place in the American approach, researchers in a series of laboratory experiments. The scientific evidence provided the research team led by Valter Longo's from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles as early as 2008. For this purpose, mice were first injected with cancer cells and then subjected to a high dose of chemotherapy drug. The mice, the two days were not fed before, survived the attempt. The normally fed mice seriously ill or died.

A striking experiment. This result is essentially due to the fact that healthy cells and tumor cells respond differently to food deprivation: Cancer cells grow, healthy cells shut down their metabolism. This makes them resistant to harmful influences from outside.

Researchers also found an explanation for this effect: Certain receptors involved in cancer development are influenced by caloric intake. Metabolic processes are accelerated or slowed. These findings went ahead with other experiments mice. Research team had discovered that more often with high-fat diet fattened mice suffering from cancer precursors than mice that were given low-calorie diet.

In another laboratory experiment, the scientists, their argument also underpin the basis of experiments on human brain cells. Cells were told by the reduced supply of glucose to better protect against the effects of chemotherapy agents. The cancer cells responded (as expected) are much more sensitive.

Of course it is always questionable how and whether such results can be transmitted to humans. Cancer patients can hope, however, that they tolerate the effects of chemotherapy in the future better if they have previously fasted for two days.

The study leader Valter Longo has so far collected findings as the basis for successful treatments for premature. First had to be proven in long-term clinical studies that cancer patients are really helped with the accompanying chemotherapy fasting could. Against self-tests is even expressly warned.

Well ... What then?

First, I think it is already problematic when patients with no prior knowledge "just so" fast . You should already know what happened there and to expect one.

If you know that but I also recommend certain cancer patients certainly modified variants of fasting . For this purpose, you should consult an experienced manager Fast. As an introductory work to make my fasting instructions recommend.

Second: What Cancer Patients with the diagnosis to lose?

No less than their lives.

In view of this, I think we need to deal intensively with the topic of fasting in cancer.

Third, I would make less time worrying about whether fast "dangerous" could be. Rather, I would ask myself as a cancer patient asks what the chemotherapy brings about? Because: As for survival in metastatic carcinoma of the colon, breast, lung and prostate, there have been over the past 25 years no significant progress!

Caloric restriction as a cancer killer?

And again, there is a new study about cancer, but this time on a topic that seems to be from another planet: for it is not a new super pill made by synthetic health-maker, but rather how to use simple " less ", ie with less calories in food, can achieve better health. The authors even auction, observations, life-prolonging effect with their presumed. Their study found Every 2nd Day fasting at the same time, slight calorie reduction seems to reduce cancer risk.

Researchers at the University of California at Berkeley conducted experiments with mice. The basic idea was to reduce the number of calories in healthy mice of the food by 5 percent. The reduction in calories was among the "diet" mice achieved by feeding only every 2nd Days took place and only 3 days a week. It was observed that the advent of cell proliferation (in the development of malignant precursor, a cell causes cancer) could be significantly reduced. The control group were healthy mice with "full fare" and without restrictions elected to the eating.

What this connection interesting in is the fact that the decrease in cell proliferation in the less-fed mice only slightly less significant in practice as in a previous experiment with mice in which the calorie intake per cent reduction has been 33 about the same. Until now, scientists like assumed that a significantly reduced cell proliferation, high calorie restriction is to be expected in only one.

In view of the efforts of mainstream medicine, the "war on cancer", especially through the use of side effects ranging and profit-oriented cytotoxic drugs (chemotherapy) to win, the gist of the matter once again seems in a much simpler and much more straightforward (unfortunately not very profit-oriented) approach to lie, namely, the calorie restriction: Eating less and eating healthier.

The Berkeley researchers argue that curbing may be in the development of cancer, already been done in advance: For this one must be able to block cell proliferation, which is the first step in the cancer.

By common conception of medicine, cancer is essentially nothing more than an uncontrolled cell division that is based on one or more mutations. Normally, each cell attempts to repair such mutations. If this is not in a certain period of time possible (prior to the time of cell division that is), then mutations that the daughter cells passed on, in turn, the mutations at their daughters to pass, etc. So if this form of cell proliferation can be slowed down, then the cell additional time granted to repair the damage mutation.

Incidentally, this is by far not the first study that has been able to show that calorie restriction has a beneficial effect on cell proliferation. In the past 70 years, studies have demonstrated that caloric restriction reduced by up to 50 percent not only the cell proliferation rates, but also led to a survival benefit in a number of organisms. This was, for example, in rats, flies, worms and yeast found. The life-prolonging effect in these organisms was between 30 and 70 percent.

As you get to ponder ...

Let's assume that it would be, is not a fast method, or change in eating habits, but a tablet. In such case, the pharmaceutical companies would immediately pursue regulatory approval, including a marketing campaign that would make it clear to the last citizen and physician, that he would be hopelessly lost without this new pill. But a pure calorie restriction? Because no one deserves something so why put money into advertising?

And now comes "The Hammer" significant restriction of caloric intake is so far the only (significant) scientifically based evidence of a survival benefit! A Physical exercise and a healthy diet, however, can only "a premature death from various diseases prevented, but have no influence to the maximum life expectancy.

The reduction in calories has to show that in addition to a reduced development of cancer increases insulin sensitivity and decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease.

That is the theory and the data. And the practice? I can say from experience that it is not easy to persuade patients to eat less, to change the eating habits or too fast. fast ! If I make some people the word "fast" just mention, then look at me some, as if I had just invited her life to start over completely from scratch ...

It will be difficult to make people understand that less is more, eating well and are on the subject. Here, the above-mentioned study, in contrast to the earlier studies) can show (that the intended waiver of any beneficial effects may not yet high turn out as expected. A five percent reduction in calorie intake or intermittent fasting full fasting seem the same quality as be - at least in animal experiments.

To practice for certain diseases but relatively quickly to see the tangible results in, I still recommend the fasting, for example, after my fasting instructions , plus a change of eating habits. This way, I have in my interview to a healthy diet described.

My first conclusion:

It appears to have been more than 70 years to know that successful cancer control strategy is a restricted calorie intake. This new study, however, shows only that there are reasons to suspect that a great low impact on the carcinogenesis not only by a waiver must be purchased in quality of life by the "healthy hunger. When created in this field data relevant not only for mice, but also for people, then the medicine can eventually but still hope to win its "war on cancer" - if it has before. But that's another story ...

The following question from the previous comments, I would like:

But something I understand in the article (not a typo perhaps 5% instead of 50% ???).

It says here:

"Researchers at the University of California at Berkeley, carried out experiments with mice. The basic idea was to reduce the number of calories in healthy mice of the food by 5 percent. The reduction in calories was among the "diet" mice achieved by feeding only every 2nd Days and took place only on 3 days a week "

So, if only every 2nd Feeding days, you do see, mathematically a calorie reduction of 50 not 5%?

My answer:

Mathematically, you are right, but unfortunately have reckoned without the mice. Because they are hungry the next day and eat everything accordingly. Compared with a day at a constant daily feeding. That means that the mice got to eat at feeding days as much as they could cram into itself. At the end of the study were then the quantities consumed by diet and normal mice compared and observed a reduction in calorie intake of 5% per cent in the diet study. At the same time, there was also a reduction in proliferation.

In my opinion, it seems to be that of feeding days when the body has enough time to take care of the repairs, instead of constantly still besides the digestion (also energy) costs to implement. I personally suspect that the reduction in calories is NOT the primary reason for the positive effects. I suspect however that the time-outs have given in to feed the body (the mice) the necessary recovery time. That will end up with a calorie reduction of 5 per cent came out, to me is pure coincidence. I think that works even if the same amount of calories is destroyed - the main thing there is calorie-free or very low-calorie days, for use by the organism to "self care". This hypothesis would be to me worth studying ...

Can Smoking Relieve Stress?

Numerous studies have shown that smoking and secondhand smoke are linked to many medical disorders including cancer, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), and stroke. So quitting smoking would certainly be beneficial to both smokers and people around them.

Interestingly, many smokers have claimed that lighting up a cigarette can actually help them reduce the stress they have. This is probably a fairly good reason for millions of smokers to light up their cigarettes again even after quitting.

But studies have found otherwise. In reality, smoking has the entirely different effect. Instead of reduced, the long-term stress levels will be raised among smokers. In fact, smokers can have their stress relieved only when they quit smoking.

In a paper published on June 7, 2010 in the journal “Addiction”, researchers from the London School of Medicine and Dentistry found that smokers who stopped lighting up cigarettes had a significant larger reduction in perceived stress.

A total of 469 people, who attempted to quit smoking after being hospitalized for heart disease, were examined. At the outset, the participants had similar stress levels and about 85 percent of these people generally believed that smoking helped them cope with the stress they had.

After a year, 41 percent of the participants managed to quit smoking completely and their perceived stress levels were reduced by about 20 percent, whereas patients who continue smoking showed little change in their perceived stress levels.

Obviously, the findings supported the theory that smoking can actually contribute to stress among some people. But why do smokers still think that lighting up a cigarette could help them relieve stress?

According to researchers, when smokers are refrained from smoking, they tend to feel more and more edgy, irritable and uncomfortable as the period lengthens. A cigarette would more or less help them get through the stressful state. This is probably the main reason smokers think that smoking help them reduce stress.

Therefore, smoking can relieve stress is actually a myth, at least in the long term.